|
|
||
05/04/07 |
|
The time has come for Australians to move forward politically and leave the two party preferred systems behind, we have to have a say as to who we vote for, those who represent our constituencies are not chosen by us they are chosen by the party, they are thrust upon us, these people must toe the party line rather than serve their electorate, it is a dictatorship not a democracy. THE UNITED INDEPENDENTS plan is a referendum system, a computerised system in which Parliament will be computerised with a web site, on which all Australians will be able to lodge their concerns, needs and objections. Our parliamentary representatives will not be required to make decisions on our behalf, all that will be required of them will be for them to process our needs and present the results to the electorate on ABC TV. And the web site. We will then vote on the subject through our PC or Communal Computers. Parliament will then adjust the laws. This will be a true democracy with Majority rule. From the prime Minister down all will have an equal one vote. On the following pages you will find documented evidence of the corrupt Political, Policing and Justice systems we live under, these systems are as bad as the most corrupt of the third world countries, starting with corrupt Lawyers dishonest Magistrates right through the whole system up to Mr. Howard and his Federal attorney general Mr. Ruddock including the Governor General. Not one has the decency or integrity to honour Australia’s own laws or the signed international laws they hold the responsibility to honour. Most of our Politicians Belong to either the Fabian Society or the Nicholls association, they have infiltrated and taken over our Parliament in breach of our Constitution which is a criminal act and is in fact Treason. See letter John Howard Click Here and the Governor General Click Here To support THE UNITED INDEPENDENTS it will not be necessary to register, but it will be necessary to pluck up the courage to advertise, form a branch, select your most keen and honest person, register that person as an independent then all members and their candidates affiliate their preferences to the members that represent the UNITED INDEPENDENTS. This I am sure will fill Parliament with CANDIDATES of our own choice collecting votes that outnumber all parties combined, leaving no doubt that People power is what we want. It will reduce these dishonest Politicians to insignificant numbers. It will also prevent foreign or local organisations from infiltrating and implementing their foreign policies from our Parliament The only funds we should need will be to fund those independents who can not afford to register themselves and some to advertise your branch in your local news papers and your local TV. Each branch will look after its own finance. (Three signatures to each cheque be careful and honest.) It may be wise for every branch to down load this web site and put it up on your own branch site. I am old and may be at risk, a while back a Lawyer By the name of George Turner was about to lodge papers with the Courts charging eleven Politicians with Treason, he was attacked as he arrived home at dusk one evening and died in hospital four days later the thugs were never arrested. There is always the chance after seeing Pauline Hanson being jailed that one of our members need financial help we will cross that one if it occurs. There is one major factor in our favour, from the day that Whitlam entered Parliament as Fabius Maximus as he was known, Parliament became invalid, every change made by these infiltrators is invalid and any move they make to hinder our legal members from taking over Parliament will be invalid and must be ignored. If I were one of these illegal infiltrators I would be a very, worried person and possibly looking for asylum. I have spent almost five years researching our systems to obtain these signed documents which incriminate each signatory, and twenty years in politics learning about the dishonesty and Treason, I have done it all for the love of the country and its people without payment. When you choose a representative choose a person that will serve his community loyally for the love of the people rather than one who thinks he or she is so important they are entitled to get their snouts in the trough. Now read or skim through the following pages and they will confirm the dishonesty most of us already know. The party system has reached its use by date; it is too wide open to abuse of every type. This is the electronic age computers enable each of us to communicate with all and every human being in the world, take advantage of it and for the first time in history the man in the street can and should have a say in the running of this Planet. ALL THAT IS NEEDED FOR EVIL TO GROW IS FOR GOOD PEOPLE TO DO NOTHING. If you are a good person and feel worthy of a seat in Parliament, But fear you may not be smart enough to handle it, fear not, Parliament House has a large crew to run the show, that is what they are paid to do and every politician has a personal adviser and access to many more, you will manage, if anyone thinks our present politicians are so smart just look at what they are up to, I would say not very smart at all and just look at them, some look a bit dim, not even their advisers can stop them from blundering, take courage and save your country from these dishonest, unjust destructive people who have no integrity. The first act in parliament needed when the UNITED INDEPENDENTS, take office will be to put in place laws that will discourage the police and our justice system from convicting innocent people. Anyone found to have presented false evidence which leads to a false judgement being passed will be put on trial and receive the same sentence as the innocent victim; this must include the Judges, Magistrates, Barristers, Lawyers, Police, Witnesses and anyone else who has aided the conviction in any way, All these people are always fully aware of the facts but because of their warped sense of justice, their natural dishonesty and their faith in the protection the boys club will afford them, they are confident they can do just as they please, this must be stopped and I am sure that if they knew that they may spend from a few days to life in prison or possible execution they will not dare indulge in perjury, dishonesty and blatant lies, for the first time in history the words the law is an Ass and there is no justice in the law will be replaced with “Thank goodness the courts are honest!” When we go to court, we all know what the result should be, but it is like lucky dip or roulette, no one knows what the result will be, it is quite ridicules, those who run the system are so twisted, they think the courts are a roulette wheel where they all make lots of money, justice dose not come into it. When I started on this mission, I got a letter from my lawyer in it he said “You are not likely to win as SM are a substantial company.” What this says is that there are no honest Judges or Magistrates in our justice system and that they will always judge in favour of the substantial offender no matter what the evidence is and then all the appointed watchdogs will dodge, lie and ignore all the laws. This is what drove me to follow through. We see these injustices almost daily, e.g. the shop owner the victim gets a good behaviour bond and the thief keeps all the stolen videos and walks free. A very sick system. This is a chance to rectify this crap do not let it slip. Mr. John Howard Prime Minister of Australia Parliament House Canberra. C/O Mr.. Bob Baldwin Federal Member for Paterson. 35 Sturgeon St Raymond Terrace. Ph 02 4983 1330 Fax 02 4987 5444.
Dear Sir, I appeal to you on two matters regarding my constitutional rights as a member of the British Commonwealth. The first is about dishonesty within our justice and Policing systems. The following pages are evidence of a case I got involved in which has been through both the justice and police departments. After a number of years of dealing with totally dishonest Judiciary and police I sent a full set of documents of the facts and copies of all the replies I received from them to the Premier of NSW Mr. Bob Carr, within a week of receiving them Mr. Carr resigned. These documents expose the corruption and dishonesty that has taken place. From there it went to Mr. Iemma and Mr. Scully who have simply refused to address the problem. My letter to Mr. Carr and the accompanying documents cover the case comprehensively. My constitutional rights to a fair hearing and a just judgment have been denied me. I have no option other than to request that you intervene and investigate these totally dishonest people who are in authority in Australia, they have no integrity and no intention of serving justice, they are making a mockery of Australia’s Courts, What they are doing is worse than the corruption in some of the third world countries, most unfitting for a civilised country like Australia. They must be removed from their positions and put on trial for committing perjury breaching Mercantile Law, the sea carriage documentation act of NSW, dereliction of duty of care to its citizens, perverting the course of justice and their dishonesty. As this is a shipping matter and they are all in breach of Mercantile Law I request you do the necessary to have them put on trial through The Hague. To breach this international agreement is a criminal offence and so is Perjury. The Magistrates and the Barrister who presented the court with perjurious sworn affidavits were fully aware of the facts of the case as can be seen in the documents, fully aware of the fact they were breaching Mercantile law, and the sea carriage act of NSW but chose to commit these criminal acts. Dishonesty of this magnitude is not acceptable. TREASON My second complaint is the cause of the dishonesty in our country. Click here to go to a picture of a book published by the Labour Party of Australia called Snapshots of hope, I purchased a copy of this book from the ABC book store. It shows a number of members of the Labour Party who openly claim to be members of the Fabian Society a Marxist organisation which has never been part of the British Empire. Take note of a picture of the Fabian coat of arms, a wolf with a sheepskin strapped to its back signifying deceit! This is where the dishonesty starts and goes right through the entire country. Take note of the extract from the Australian Constitution which clearly forbids these people who’s alliances are clearly with a foreign power, from sitting in our parliament, from where they are clearly running their foreign agenda, This is Treason and I wish to lay charges of treason against these people and any other members in Parliament who are under a foreign alliance, . In addition I wish to point out that in the early fifties the then Prime Minister of the time introduced a pension scheme to which every citizen of Australia paid seven percent of their income, this entitled them to a pension when they reached retirement age, no matter what their financial situation would be, if they paid in it was their money they got paid out. I have watched the Prime Minister of the time on TV state that from that day forth every Australian’s pension would be a right not a privilege. When Paul Keating became Prime Minister He transferred the pensioner’s funds a very large amount of money into general funds and took the pension away from a large number of people This is not just theft it is grand theft, considering he was sitting in Parliament illegally I wish to lay charges of grand theft against him and all those who assisted to commit this heinous crime. Because of this crime many old people’s lives have been made very uncomfortable. During that same period the government sold the Commonwealth Bank and allowed the Australian Reserve Bank to become Foreign owned. Again considering those responsible for this atrocity were sitting in Parliament illegally and the fact that the issuance of all Australian money is now controlled by a foreign power, I wish to lay charges of not just treason but High Treason against these people. I am available for further discussion at any time. I remain Maurice P Roberts Maurice P Roberts Lot 42 Greswick Rd East Seaham NSW 2324 24 May 2004 Mr.. Bob. Carr, Premier of NSW Parliament House NSW. Forwarded by Mr. John Bartlett MP. Member for Port Stephens Dear Sir, The dishonesty, corruption and collusion in our justice and policing systems is overwhelming. Firstly I would like to go back a little and thank you for the effort you made in 1997. My neighbours and I were embroiled in the compensation for victims of crime act, it was over a case where a person in our neighbourhood had their house burgled. The burglar was arrested by the home owner. It ended up with the courts dismissing the burglary and fining the home owner a thousand dollars and awarding the burglar three thousand dollars compensation. The justice system were paying thieves to burgle our homes. This case also involved corruption within the Wallsend Police station which ended with all the police being transferred away. We then had reconciliation with the new crew. I still have this document in my file. We approached Mr.. Mills MP for Wallsend to have this matter addressed. This was at a time when little eleven year old Ebony Simpson had been brutally raped and murdered. Her murderer had been beaten up in jail and the courts had awarded him $50,000.00. The hearing for this payment was almost immediate, most certainly before her family had been considered or even received counseling. Fortunately you, Mr. Carr stepped in and put a stop to it. You put Legislation through parliament that corrected that problem, for which we were most grateful. I still have the gazette on that change. Click Here I now have a much bigger problem. I got caught up in a scam with a shipping company when I contracted them to convey two containers from Johannesburg South Africa to East Seaham NSW. The contract was door to door paid in advance. The shipping company falsified the documents, took my containers hostage and demanded I pay them a second time. I paid again to prevent my goods from being sold by auction. At this point I must lay out the basic facts of this case according to Mercantile Law (see below) For Mr. Carr's replies CLICK HERE UNDERSTANDING THE FREIGHT BUSINESS In accordance with Mercantile Law in a Door to Door contract which has been paid in advance for which I have proof, the consignee becomes the owner of the Bill of Lading and the only one to have TITLE to the goods. There are no circumstances that can alter this other than that which is criminal. It is not within the Magistrates jurisdiction to pass a judgement which does not comply with these rules, no matter what sort of a ploy the Barrister comes up with. If he does he is in breach of Mercantile Law which is a criminal offence. Incompetence is no excuse as all this information was in his possession. I took the shippers to the CTTT to claim back the second payment and the additional costs I had suffered. Mr. Smith of the CTTT informed me that he would transfer the case to the local Court. I objected as I had gone to the CTTT in the first place because I could not afford a lawyer. I pointed this out to Mr.. Smith and he assured me I had the Constitutional right to represent myself and defend myself and the courts would make allowances for me. I still did not agree as I could not face the idea that they would have a lawyer and I would not. He gave me the impression that I had no choice. I know now that this is not the case. The fact is that if I objected the case could not be transferred. I was misled and misinformed. To me I now feel there was collusion between the shippers and Mr. Smith, This is despicable, dishonest illegal and a criminal act which needs to be dealt with in a most severe way. The Local Courts allowed this case (211/03) to drag on for eighteen months. Considering the documents were ready for a hearing at the CTTT and considering the courts stipulate five months limit CLICK HERE the situation was ridiculous and a sick joke. Since then I have corresponded with every department in both the justice and policing systems. I found one honest policeman, the rest were unhelpful and dishonest and are all guilty of dereliction of duty of care. They disgust me and I appeal to you to do what you did for us in the compensation for victims of crime crisis. The lawyers, barristers and magistrates play around with peoples lives causing great distress to not only myself but it passes on to my entire extended family and friends who all get affected by it, apart from the fact that it clogs the courts. I feel sure that this sort of behaviour is designed to demoralise those who seek justice. It provides an opportunity for the criminal element to win by default. I was not only fighting the dishonesty of the shippers but also dishonesty in the justice system. It began to look as if the justice system favoured the criminal element. This despicable behaviour also requires severe correction. During this delay the shippers’ lawyers added two more cases one case (1235/03) accusing me of defamation and sued me for $40,000.00. This was ridiculous. Defamation is defined as untrue statements made public. This I had not done plus the fact that defamation is not within the jurisdiction of the local court Safron 19 (1)(b). This forced me to lodge a cross claim for $40,000.00. to protect myself. Neither the courts, barrister, the lawyers or the magistrate had heard of Safron 19 (1)(b); the magistrate was quite prepared to hear this case until he read my cross claim. He did not reprimand the lawyers or the court officials for this disgusting behaviour. He just mentioned he would have to look into it. It is despicable for the courts, lawyers and barristers to indulge in this sort of behaviour. It is evil. It must not be allowed to happen. It put enormous strain on my family. The second lodgment was in connection with the return of the containers, case (226/03). This is also absurd as the return of the containers was part of the original contract. There was no reason to separate the two as once the fraud (211/03) had been settled the return of the containers would have been automatic. It just added to the courts’ load unnecessarily. I lodged an objection to the court, Nothing I wrote or said was ever replied to or acknowledged. I constantly asked the court for the Bill of Lading. I even asked Magistrate Willson directly in the court for an order to force the shipper to produce this supreme document. I was ignored. The containers were shipped all the way without any documentation at all and the criminal cases went right through the whole of the justice system and police department without this vital document. It still remains hidden to this day. Originally the scam depended on the withholding of this supreme document and both the Justice department and the Police department have given the corporate thieves all the assistance they needed to keep this document hidden. If the courts had done an honest job within their guide lines of five months to completion, as well as complying with Mercantile Law, Bills of Lading and the sea carriage documentation act of NSW, all that dishonesty and the opportunity for the barrister to commit perjury would have been averted. The additional cases would not have added to the congestion in the courts. This needs some serious investigation and correction. These ploys were designed to bully me into submission. It is disgusting behaviour by so-called Honourable Members. They are very sick people with no conscience, honesty, integrity or sense of Justice. There were two magistrates involved in the hearing. Magistrate Willson started the case in the Toronto court. He went on long leave half way through when Magistrate Elliott sat in. During Mr. Elliott’s call-overs he read my statement of claim and stated that I needed to be more specific about who exactly I was suing. He also told Safmarine’s Lawyers that with their submissions they would not win the case and said that he would give them another chance to resubmit as he did not want them to feel they had not had a fair trial. (This can be heard on the court audio tapes). I had entered the Defendant as Safmarine Sealand Maersk Moller, as I had received correspondence from all these companies. I felt Moller and his associate companies were collectively responsible and I still do. However the requirements were that I submit an amended statement naming the defendant as Safmarine Australia Pty. Ltd. as this was the company that actually took my containers hostage and took the second payment. This satisfied the magistrate in pleading my case. My legal adviser as well as the chamber magistrate read it and were satisfied that it was quite clear in pleading the case. No other changes were necessary. The call-overs continued the last being set for the 29/July 2003. This was eighteen months after the CTTT hearing was transferred. On the way to the court I collected a slip from my letter box to collect a registered article from the Post office. On arrival at the court I found the call over without notice had become a hearing. Safmarine had hired a barrister and two lawyers to represent them. The barrister handed some papers to me in the court after the hearing had started. The magistrate asked me if the three cases could be heard right there and then. I began to explain that the new submissions should have been sent to me fourteen days prior to the hearing and that I should have been notified of the hearing fourteen days prior to the hearing. He flew into a rage yelled at me to answer yes or no. My answer was no. The Barrister Julie Anne Soars must have decided on a dishonest ploy that she was pretty sure she could pull off. She then proceeded to state that their defense was based on the fact that my statement of claim did not plead the cause. This is an absolute lie. It was meticulously presented in every detail and fully documented. It had already been accepted by Mr.. Elliott. She handed two extracts to me right there in the court which should have been sent to me fourteen days prior to the hearing. They were supposed to prove her point. I realised that the hearing was on and no matter what I said it fell on deaf ears. The ploy was to claim that the request for me to submit an amended statement of claim meant that the whole statement needed change. This was ridiculous. It was a sequence of events the facts of the contract that could not be changed and besides it had already been accepted by the court. Apart from the fact that their statement of defense was a parallel to my statement of claim except that they had falsified the dates and the documents to suit their twisted story, Mr. Willson and Ms Soars were indulging in a thoroughly dishonest disgusting ploy. Everyone understood the statement of claim except Mr. Willson and Ms Soars. They were expressing their ignorance and being blatantly dishonest. They brushed aside Mercantile Law and the Bill of Lading as if they were exempt. To make this preposterous claim is simply unbelievable, outrageous, ridiculous and perjury. This makes Ms Soars guilty of perjury and the magistrate likewise. I later read the two extracts to find they had nothing to do with shipping, mercantile law, the sea carriage documentation act of NSW, containers or anything that even vaguely touched on shipping. It was to do with car insurance, an absolute farce. She then handed three sworn affidavits to the Magistrate see CLICK HERE. These were in the package which I had the slip for and collected on the way home. Two stated that Safmarine had produced the Bill of Lading number JNBZ20282 on the 24 Feb.2002. Now look at BLUE STAR page. Two documents we received from Blue Star Trucking when the containers were delivered to the loading point in South Africa. They both have this number on them but are dated 3 Jan. 2002. So their sworn affidavits claiming the Bill of Lading Number JNBZ20282 was produced on the 24 Feb. 2002 is a lie and perjury as they were presented to the court as evidence. This makes Ms Soars and the Magistrate guilty of a second count of perjury. The third affidavit states that the containers must be returned in accordance with the Bill of Lading and the Handover Agreement. I asked for the Bill of Lading and the Handover Agreement to substantiate this claim. (Listen to audio tape.) The barrister and magistrate suddenly became extremely deaf and everything I said was ignored. It must be noted that I was not in possession of the sworn affidavits. I collected those from the post office on my way home from the hearing. This is illegal and nullifies the case. Note in the audio tapes I made no mention of the perjury because I had not read the affidavits presented to the magistrate. This is not in line with legal procedure and the court is out of order. I also asked the magistrate how the courts could continue the cases as James Neill, Safmarine’s lawyers had withdrawn from all three cases, see letter dated 30 May 2003. I handed a copy of the letter to the magistrate. I was ignored on this matter as well. It became obvious that the magistrate had chosen to do a dishonourable thing and put his support behind the barrister and the criminal element in these cases. He accepted the sworn affidavits as if they were true and went along with the barrister’s ploy. He had no intention of abiding by Mercantile Law and could not care less about the Bill of Lading. The words (Supreme Document) were not conducive to the ploy. The falsified Bill of Lading had to be ignored for their ploy to be effective. This is apart from the fact that they were in breach of the Sea Carriage Documentation act of NSW. This is criminal. They are thoroughly dishonest, lack integrity, have no decency and absolutely lacking in a sense of justice or compassion for the victims of crime. It is absolutely disgraceful, disgusting and unacceptable. What they did does not change the fact that fraud and perjury had been committed. That will always remain a fact and will always remain in breach of Mercantile Law. This dishonesty must be stopped. I was struck out on the original CTTT which had become the 211/03 case on the grounds that I had not pleaded the cause, which is untrue. I was struck out on the 1235/03 and the 226/03 cross claims without any explanation on what grounds. Judgements was passed in chambers ordering me to pay the corporate thieves an additional $11,000.00. Unjust and disgraceful. I am the victim of the fraud, not the perpetrator. I have seen this reversal of facts too often in our justice system. It must be stopped. THIS IS MY OFFICIAL COMPLAINT
BOTH THE BARRISTER AND THE MAGISTRATE WERE FULLY AWARE THAT SAFMARINE HAD WITHDRAWN FROM ALL PROCEEDINGS.
I presented my complaint to the Judicial Commissioner, Mr. Schmatt with a full set of documents to enable him to asses the case with clarity. He skirted around the facts and the truth. He should know better than this as justice is based in the truth. Only unjust judgments can come from the perjury they have immersed themselves in. He knows that this is a shipping matter and is therefore subject to Mercantile Law. It is not his choice to dispense with the Bill of Lading. It is a supreme document on which everything depends. It is evidence of the contract a receipt of payment and it gives the owner the sole right and TITLE to the goods. The owner of the Bill of Lading is Maurice P. Roberts most certainly not Safmarine. Mr.. Schmatt is aiding and abetting a crime. He is in breach of Mercantile Law which is a criminal offence. He is a dishonest man with no integrity. Show me an unjust judgements and I will show you the perjury. You will also notice in the letter from the Judicial Commissioner, Mr. Schmatt that the justice system feels, a just judgements can be passed by using sworn affidavits that are pure perjury, and he states that it is not necessary to consider the facts and the evidence. IS HE SERIOUS? He along with the rest seem to think they can simply disregard the facts and the truth and lie their way out of any situation without consequence no matter how unjust and evil. He also states that the magistrate did not shout at me. Well I have the audio tapes which show unequivocally that Mr.. Schmatt is a compulsive liar on more than just the facts, documents and perjury. The shouting is quite clear on the court audio tape. This has come about because it has become common practice for lawyers and barristers to present the courts with what the man in the street knows as lies and the courts call perjury. The lawyers and barristers know it. So do the magistrates and judges know it? These practices are taught to them in university. They are told that there is Justice and then there is the Law. Utter rubbish. There is no such thing. To lie in court is to commit perjury, which is a criminal offence.. We think it is the time in history when people are civilised enough to know this is no longer acceptable. We see too many ridiculous judgements being made these days. It is time to investigate the judiciary, and eliminate the dishonest and unjust that have no integrity. We must ensure those who serve justice are honest, have integrity, believe justice is based in the truth and above all have a supreme sense of justice. Following are the replies I received from all the watchdogs I have appealed to hoping I would find an honest one amongst them You will notice in their replies that not one acknowledges Mercantile Law. They all seem to think they are exempt. They are all in breach of Mercantile Law which is a criminal offence. Not one of them has made any effort to obtain the supreme document, the Bill of Lading to ensure they know what they are investigating. This makes them guilty of breaching the Sea Carriage Documentation Act of NSW. They are also all guilty of perverting the course of justice AND ARE GUILTY OF DERELICTION OF DUTY OF CARE. CLICK HERE to see the judgment. This is in fact nonsense as the hearing was not conducted with the proper fourteen day presentation of the documents. There is no registration of the barrister or the two lawyers. The wrong magistrate was registered, the sworn affidavits are perjurious, the extracts are a farce, the claim that the statement of claim did not plead the cause is a contradiction of everything already established and a dishonest ploy. James Neill had already withdrawn from all the cases. No reasons were given for striking out my cross claim on the defamation. The legal fact of this matter is that they lost the case by default. The supreme document, the Bill of Lading was not presented to substantiate their claim. The hand over agreement was not presented to substantiate that claim. The courts acted in a most inappropriate and dishonest way. They are truly sick people and a sick court. This is the worst injustice I have experienced. It must be put right. These pages CLICK HERE are from the Attorney General. Mr. Debus starts off by stating that the Sea Carriage Documentation act of NSW does not fall within his portfolio and states it is federal. A letter from the federal Senator Ellison as well as the Minister for Justice Mr. Hatzistergos stating that it is Mr.. Debus’ responsibility to control the courts to assure they operate in an honest and just manner. The result of this is dishonesty negligence passing the buck and dodging the real issues. The word justice means nothing to Mr. Debus. He thinks it is some sort of a cat and mouse game in which he feels pretty confident that he can do just as he pleases without consequence. Mr. Debus refuses to attend to the criminal activity taking place in the court involving the magistrate and the Judicial Commissioner and then refuses to correspond further. It is disgraceful behaviour for a person in his position. This department needs to face up to its responsibilities. These pages CLICK HERE are copies of the fraudulent Bill of Lading. Note in the middle of the page it states Freight Prepaid and at the bottom is the altered date. It is a criminal offence to alter the documents. The import delivery order is virtually a blank document. It certainly did not travel with the containers as there are no signatures on it, yet a judgment was passed using this illegal document. It is dishonest and incompetent behaviour which must be put right. These documents CLICK HERE are dealings with the police I got the impression that they have a ploy in which they will firstly attempt to fob off the person that tries to lay any charges as can be seen in the letters from Mr. Nixon and Mr. Dyson. They know that fraud is a criminal offence, so does every citizen of Australia. Why all the hassle. Can’t they just be honest and get on with what they are being paid to do. I then presented my case to Mr.. Moroney supplying him with a full set of documents to be assured the facts would not be misconstrued. He appointed Mr.. Haggett of the Lower Hunter to investigate my complaint as to the inaction of the police regarding the perjury charges, which the police refused to follow through. In Mr. Haggett’s reply he states that he has reviewed the documents and then goes off at a tangent about a separate agent that has supposedly run off without passing in my payment. He then states that the company has since closed. It has not closed and he knows it. If he has reviewed the documents it merely had a name change. If he had really reviewed the documents he would have to admit that what he has stated is the original ploy used by Safmarine. The fact of the matter is that there is no intermediate company. They are part of and owned by Safmarine. The Bill of Lading number is a Safmarine Number JNBZ20282. It appears on the Blue Star Documents dated 3 Jan. 2002. My contract was and still is with Safmarine. The sworn affidavits state this number was produced on the 24 Feb. 2002. They are lying about the date of issue. Mr. Haggett knows this as well as the rest of us. If it was true Safmarine would not have altered the documents and made these perjurious sworn affidavits. He has chosen to ignore the dates and the falsification of the documents, brushed aside Mercantile Law, the Sea Carriage Act, the Bill of Lading and put his support behind the corporate thieves. This is his choice and there must be a consequence to this behaviour. He seems to be oblivious of the fact that what he was supposed to be investigating was a case of perjury. Is he trying to fool me by going off at this tangent or is he plain incompetent. Prior to this under the direction of the Attorney General and the Judicial Commissioner I took the perjury charge to the police. Detective Sergeant Devonshire went through the documents with me and laid charges of perjury against a number of people. Mr. Haggett claims that Mr. Devonshire made a record of the event No E22411155. It was not an event. Charges were laid and a charge sheet was entered into the computer. Mr. Haggett has removed these charges. This is illegal and must be rectified. Mr. Haggett also claims that he discussed the documents with me. This is an outrageous lie. Not one word has ever passed between us. He states that my claim is a civil case between E.F. and myself. The charges of perjury I laid are against those who presented perjurious sworn affidavits to the court. He is dodging the issue. He is so wrapped up in the ploy that he has lost the plot. Mr.. Haggett is dishonest, incompetent and untrustworthy. How can any one expect justice out of this dishonesty? I then went back to Mr. Moroney with a complaint about the ridiculous, dishonest and off the subject statements made by Mr. Haggett. I made it quite clear that the charges were perjury. These pages CLICK HERE are from the Northern Region Professional standards unit signed by Mr.. R. Wells. Mr. Wells starts off by asserting that Mr. Haggett had discussions with me. This is more lies and dishonesty within the system. They can’t even be honest with each other. He states that the subject had been adequately addressed and investigated. He must think I am a total idiot. The Standards Unit met on the 1 Nov. 2004. They obviously did no investigating at all, or they would have pressed the charges of both fraud and perjury. What a farce. Gutter standards. The Ombudsman might just as well not be there. They should either be given some powers (teeth) or just dumped. I have dealt with them before and the result is always the same, a toothless tiger full of excuses. These pages CLICK HERE are from the Legal Services Commission. My complaint to the Commissioner was that the James Neill Solicitors and Julie Anne Soars Barrister had presented the court with sworn affidavits which were Perjurious, so the charge was PERJURY. The perjury took place at the so called hearing not before and was a deliberate criminal act to pervert the course of justice. It seems Mr. Steve Mark is in collusion with the courts, the police and the rest as he has gone off at the same tangent about the fraud which was not part of the complaint and therefore needed no reply. He has avoided the real issue which is perjury committed at the so called hearing. Mr.. Mark states that the Bill of Lading is the property of Safmarine, This is an ignorant statement and is utterly untrue. If he had read the information headed Understanding the Freight Business, which I supplied to him he would have known, that in a paid in advance contract, the Bill of Lading is the possession of the consignee Maurice P. Roberts who from then on is the only one WITH TITLE to the goods and this is the crux of the matter. No matter what any one says even a magistrate, this is a fact of Mercantile law which is an international agreement signed by Australia, and no one is exempt. Not Mr. Willson, Ms Soars, Mr. Selth or James Neill. What they are doing is a breach of mercantile law, a criminal offence. The letter from the Executive Director (link above) of the NSW Bar Association Mr. P. A. Selth. He simply refuses to do the job he is being paid to do by us the tax payer. He is a public servant and as such with an attitude like this we are perfectly entitled to sack him. This is a fact of the matter. More importantly by his refusal he is in breach of his duty of care. Due to this breach he becomes guilty of breach of Mercantile Law, breach of the Sea Carriage Documentation Act of NSW and guilty of perverting the course of justice. He has also failed to address the perjury committed by James Neill and Ms Soars which is the actual complaint. I wonder what he thinks excuses him from the duty he is being paid to do. A man of his knowledge must know these are all criminal offences. He also says my letter is offensive. He should also know that respect is earned. It does not come with the appointment. It is earned through honesty and integrity. He is short on these qualities and this goes for all these so called honorable people. These documents CLICK HERE are from the ICAC signed by The HON. Jerrold Cripps QC. He is another very well informed man of meaningless words. This is a deliberate attempt to fob me off. He has not been truthful about any of the facts or documents, by ignoring the fraud, perjury and falsification of the documents, Mercantile Law as well as the Sea Carriage Documentation Act of NSW, which are criminal offences and carry the weight of the law behind them. I think he should be a very worried man as he is also perverting the course of justice. For this there are consequences and penalties which I trust you will administer. It is a sorry government that allows the aged population that built the country to have their investment plundered. They have unjustly taken away my constitutional right to represent and defend myself in our courts of justice in this criminal way. This dishonesty must be stopped as it is most unfair. I am now seventy three years old. To persecute an old person like this is unjustifiable. Is there no respect or compassion left? It is appalling and despicable behaviour. Mr. Cripps needs to live up to his title (Honourable) he is a little short on HONOUR. Trusting this matter will be treated with honesty and integrity at your earliest convenience bearing in mind that this case has traumatized my entire family and some of my friends and associates for over three years. Please spare me the pain of taking my case to The Hague. Yours faithfully, Maurice P. Roberts.
CONCLUSION to Mr. Bob Carr To conclude Mr. Carr, as you represent the Australian Government you represent the signature on the agreement in The Hague that binds Australia to abide by The Hague rules in mercantile law. It is therefore within your duty of care to enforce those rules. As mercantile law carries the weight of the law behind it, any breach of the rules is a criminal offence. Each individual who has put his signature to a letter which breaches The Hague rules has committed a criminal offence. It is your duty to lay criminal charges against every one of them. As each of them will then end up with a criminal record and no one with a criminal record may hold a government post or practice law. It will be your duty to remove them from the justice and policing systems. I do believe you are honorable and strong enough to face up to this major task. If this case were to be put onto parable form it would go like this. A policeman, a barrister and a magistrate were walking along the street when they came across an old man being mugged by a ruthless thug. They rushed up to observe. The old man was virtually fighting for his life. The policeman took out his truncheon and hit the old man over the head who fell to the ground bleeding from his wounds. The thug claimed the old man was attacking him and the barrister took on his case. In spite of the fact that they all knew the truth of the matter they agreed to lay the blame on the old man as he was an easy target. The magistrate took the old man’s wallet from his pocket and handed it to the thug who then took out half the money and handed it to the barrister in payment for his services and they walked away. The excuse for this judgement was. The policeman claimed the old man used too much force and that was why he had to be stopped. The barrister said he had no duty of care to the old man as he was rendering a service to the thug. The magistrate claimed he passed judgement using evidence from the policeman and the barrister in the form of sworn affidavits. The fact that the evidence was a total lie and perjury did not bother any of them as they were all totally void of conscience, compassion or integrity and they felt confident that they would get away with it as they would be protected by the system. Mr.. Carr I think it would be wise of you to rectify our justice system. People without integrity are not to be trusted. They could turn on you at any time and it will be you dependant on the law to serve justice. I am sure if it was you that ended up in a similar situation and you found yourself unjustly behind bars as many have in these modern times, without being able to defend yourself from the dishonesty within the system, you may regret not rectifying it when you had the chance.
I Remain, Maurice P Roberts
Maurice P Roberts Lot 42 Greswick Rd East Seaham NSW 2324 12/1/2004 Attorney General Goodsell Building Sydney. Ref s125281 File No 02/4396
Dear Sir, Regarding the case 226/03. This case was withdrawn by James Neil Solicitors on the 30 May see accompanying letter yet the Toronto Courts have allowed The Magistrate Mr Elliott to pas a judgement on it on the 9th Sep 2003 I have written to the Toronto Court twice asking for an explanation to this irregularity but have not had a reply. The sheriff has called with a demand for $1100,00 I have not yet had a hearing and the claimant has not yet produced the Bill of Lading to prove they have title to this claim. This is a Ridiculous situation and must be rectified immediately.
Trusting this matter will receive your most urgent attention I remain M Roberts. UNDERSTANDING THE FREIGHT BUSINESS 4th EDITION BY DEREK E. DOWNS PUBLISHER MICOR FREIGHT U.K. LTD.
The Bill of Lading should show all steps in the process and each step is signed off as it moves forward. A good shipping company would not ship without it as they lay themselves open to legal action for not looking after the interests of their customers. “Bills of Lading For ocean shipments this is the supreme document. In legal terms it is “a receipt for goods shipped, a document of title and evidence of the contract of affreightment”. In commercial terms, the Bill of Lading has an accepted special identity, and may be regarded as a combined “ticket for the journey” and “title deeds” of the goods. Possession of a negotiable Bill of Lading, properly completed, constitutes effective control of the goods. Cargo shipped by “conventional” (non-containerised) vessels is normally covered by a port to port Bill of Lading but as most cargoes are now containerised the Combined Transport Bill of Lading is the normal version which extends the carrier’s liability to cover the inland sectors in country of export and to inland destination after discharge from vessel. This form of Bill of Lading, therefore, details the “place of receipt” and “place of delivery” as well as the ports of loading and discharge. For banking purposed Bills of Lading are normally drawn like a cheque “to order” or to the order of the named bank. Where banking processing is not required, the documents may be drawn to the order of the consignee. Bills of Lading may have a few pages added, but they may never be changed. The customer at the destination must receive the Bill of Lading via whatever channels are required prior to the arrival of goods in order to avoid local demurrage and expenses.
APPLICATION OF THE HAMBURG RULES
Section 12 (13) page 8 subject to section 15 the Hamburg rules have the force of the law in Australia. Any breach of Mercantile Law is a criminal offence.
GUARD GUIDANCE ON BILLS OF LADING Since delivery against a received shipment bill of lading is unusual the master should also check wether or not original shipped bills of lading have been issued. If they have there may be a suspicion of fraud since as explained above the original received for shipment bill of lading would normally be stamped or surrendered and replaced (but never discarded) part 1 page 11. Fraudulent bills of lading may exist and it is therefore important that the master thoroughly checks that the original bill of lading presented is genuine and that the endorsements are genuine. Part 1 page 18. Letters of indemnity. The charterer and or shipper may try to persuade the master to accept a letter of indemnity or similar undertaking in return for delivering the cargo without production of an original bill of lading. Such requests should be resisted due to the risk involved in accepting such letters or undertakings. Part 2 page 20. There are always and should be consequences for our behaviour COMPENSATION FOR VICTIM OF CRIME VICTIM MAURICE P ROBERTS Lot42 Greswick Rd East Seaham NSW 2324 The following claim is made on the grounds that if a person presents false evidence to the courts and the evidence causes the victim to be wrongly judged, those responsible for this criminal behaviour must individually compensate the person so wrongly judged by paying compensation of the same amount. In this case $120,000.00 All the following are guilty of Breach of Mercantile law. It is a criminal offence to breach this internationally singed agreement known as the Hague rules. Signed by Australia in The Hague. They are all guilty of contravening the Sea Carriage Documentation Act of NSW. They have all failed to obtain the Bill of Lading; the Bill of Lading is the SUPREME document. They are all guilty of producing or dealing with falsified documents and Perjurious sworn affidavits, also criminal offences. This makes them guilty of dereliction of duty of care and perverting the course of justice.
Mr Smith of the CTTT. NSW Bar Association P A Selth James Neil Solicitors ICAC Commissioner Jerrold Cripps Tom Dachs A P Moller Vagn Lehd Moller Moller Hunt & Hunt Michael Dowzer Bob Car Premier NSW Julie A Soars barrister Bob Debus Attorney General X 4 Accompanying Solicitor Morris Iemma Premier NSW Accompanying Solicitor Carl Scully Toronto Courts. Failing to acknowledge Tony Stewart James Neil’s withdrawal Safmarine Australia Pty Ltd False A P Moller Safmarine S A Claim, Storage, Loss on Saw Mill, Thomas Briggs Interest and Expenses $ 2.2 M Million Peter Debnam Phillip Ruddock Att Gen. John Howard. Prime Minister. A P Moller AUS Kent Hagbarth Mahim Khanna Des Knox Rajar Alan Phaal Wetherlys Decorating Warehouse Mick Keelty. Richard Smeltink AFP Evaluation Team. Peter Debnam Phillip Ruddock Att Gen. John Howard. Prime Minister. Dilip Wijenayake Magistrates Elliott Magistrate Wilson Judicial commissioner E J Schmatt Minister for Justice J Hatzistergos N S W police D S Nixon D I Dyson D S C Hogbin Commander C Haggett Mr K Moroney Police Commissioner R Wells Professional standards David Chie Ombudsman Legal services commissioner Steve Mark &Anne Sinclair. Maurice Roberts 0Lot 42 Greswick Rd East Seaham 2324 NSW 1 Nov 05 Mr Morris Iemma Premier of NSW. Forwarded by Mr John Bartlett M P. Member for Port Stephens. Dear sir, I addressed a complaint for investigation to the then Premier of NSW Mr Bob Carr. Mr. Carr forwarded it on to Mr Bob Debus and then resigned. I wrote to Mr Bartlett pointing out that Mr Debus had already had the opportunity to rectify the inappropriate behaviour of the justice system And I new he would not do the honest thing and admit to his own failure. I requested Mr Bartlett redirect my documents to you Mr Iemma., There was no point in putting the fox in charge of the chickens. However Mr Debus accepted the task and has come up with a very strange reply he mentions investigating only the fraud. He has failed to investigate the fact that Mr Smith of the CTTT passed my case on to the Local court Against my wishes which is not permitted within the system, this is against the written law. He has also failed to abide by Mercantile law which is a criminal offence, he has also failed to comply with the Sea Carriage Documentation act of NSW which he has under review at his very time He has failed to address the perjury that has taken place within the justice system, he has failed to address the fact that the documents in this case had been falsified, he has failed to address the fact that the magistrates and the judicial commissioner have knowingly perverted the course of justice. I hereby lodge an official complaint against Mr Bob Debus and request you investigate this whole matter and assure justice is done. Trusting this matter will receive your earliest attention as this case has traumatised my entire family and some of my friend and has already taken up almost four years of my retirement years I Remain Maurice P Roberts To see Mr. Iemma's replies CLICK HERE
Conclusion Mr Iemma A week after my complaint arrived in Bob Car’s office he resigned. The earlier correspondence between myself and Mr Morris Iemma new Premier of NSW. The reason I have followed this matter to parliament is because parliament are the only recourse we the citizens of Australia have against crocked Judges or Magistrates it is Parliament alone that hires and fires Judges and Magistrates Mr Iemma will not acknowledge the basic facts, He brushes aside mercantile law knowing full well that it is an international agreement that carries the weight of the law behind it, to breach this agreement is a criminal offence, in his position the signature in the Hague is his. He refuses to acknowledge that the documents have been falsified and refuses to acknowledge that the sworn affidavits are perjury, He knows the Magistrates ignored the facts and the evidence the Judicial commissioner says so in his letter, he knows the magistrates refused to order the Bill of Lading to be produced to prove title to my good, he knows this is all criminal behaviour on the part of the entire justice department and those in the Police department that have dodged the issue, yet he refuses to act in an honourable manner with honesty and integrity, I will leave you to judge what sort of a man he is. We do not have a justice system we have an abomination of evil people who favour the criminals, birds of a feather flock together, we see it on TV almost daily, it is time for a political change to win back our country from the multinationals who are destroying our country with their free world trade which in turn is destroying our farms and industries, dump the parties that are destroying Australia, the Multinational Nicholls Liberals and the Marxist Fabian labour, they are foreign powers running Australia for their own gain we matter not all. Maurice P Roberts Lot 42 Greswick Rd East Seaham NSW 2324 27 July 2006 RML 67229 The Hon Carl Scully MP C/O Mr Tony Stewart MP Parliamentary Secretary for Police. Level 36 Governor Macquarie Towers 1 Farrer Place, Sydney NSW 2000. P9228 4455 F9228 4633 Dear Sirs, These are the facts to remove any argument in relation to this case 1 It starts with a charge of fraud being laid at the Watt St Police Station Newcastle, this is not civil. Fraud is criminal and especially in this case as it involves shipping which is subject to Mercantile Law, and any breach of mercantile law is a criminal offence. The police Failed to act 2 I took the case to the CTTT. It was moved to the local court by Mr smith illegally, this is not civil it is a criminal act on behalf of Mr Smith The Police failed to act. 3 The Toronto court Failed to issue a subpoena or court order at my request, to force the Shippers to present the Bill of Lading the SUPREME document to prove their case. As any breach of Mercantile Law and especially the BILL OF LADING is a criminal offence this is criminal. The police failed to act 4The Barrister Ms Julie A Soars presented the court with Sworn Affidavits which are clearly Perjury. I laid charges against her and those who wrote those statements at the Raymond Terrace Police Station under guidance from the Attorney General. This is criminal WE know it and so do YOU the police refused to act. 5 In the documents I presented to the Raymond Terrace Police are copies of the falsified Bill of Lading and hand over agreement, this is criminal, the Police refused to act etc .Skirting around these facts is called a lie of omission, a lie is a lie and in this case as a court matter where you are all under oath to those who put you into Parliament it is Perjury, Please explain how you got around the Sea Carriage documentation act of NSW, this is a law of the Parliament you sit in to serve us, how dishonest You may want to attempt to explain this away Please do. I would like to point out a pattern that not only runs through all the correspondence I have had with the Police department but also shows up regularly on TV as well as from so many people I have spoken to who have had the misfortune of becoming victims of crime. There is a tendency to Fob off the victims as if it is routine, look at this case and you will see this pattern, every letter treats me as if I am a Moron and I will not notice that they are acting outside the law and being dishonest, they brush aside the facts such as Mercantile Law, Fraud Perjury and their duty of care etc as if they are Exempt, not very smart, they probably think it is clever, it is criminal. The image the Police including yourselves are earning due to this is one that is destructive, honour and respect are earned through honesty and integrity, very sadly missing This letter is to put you on notice to ensure you are both fully informed as I add your names to the list of those I will eventually individually sue. I expect you to rectifying the criminal behaviour as there are always consequences for one’s actions the choice is yours. I remain Maurice P Roberts To see Mr. Sculley's replies CLICK HERE
Mr Morris Iemma Premier of NSW Forwarded by Mr John Bartlett M P. Member for Port Stephens.
Dear Sir, I thank you for your reply dated 9 Dec 2005, I feel I must approach you again as you have only addressed the fraud. I would like you to put aside the fraud and address the real issue which is the dishonesty and corruption within both the Justice and Police Departments. I have already dealt with the Judicial Commissioner and the Police, My complaints are against both these departments. I must ask you kindly and honestly to answer the questions in my letter dated the 1 Nov 2005. I supplied you with a list of the people in both departments who are guilty of criminal behaviour, in the files there letters from every one of these people signed by them incriminating themselves. This is a shipping matter and therefore all must abide by Mercantile Law, they are not free to run their own agenda, they must abide by the Hague Rules, they are not ignorant people who do not know any better they are well educated and intelligent people fully aware of the facts, their dishonesty is deliberate, this is what makes them so despicable any breach of this system is a criminal offence, this is the crux of the matter, I know this is a very difficult matter to deal with but it must be done. Trusting you will deal with this matter with honesty and integrity, which will earn you the respect worthy of the Premier of NSW, would the other be worth it. Trusting this matter will receive your earliest possible attention considering this matter has now entered its fifth year. It is absolutely disgraceful behaviour by both the Justice and police departments, appalling people who must be removed from the system to put a stop to the dishonesty cover-up and corruption.
I remain Maurice P Roberts.
FINAL CONCLUSION It has become obvious that justice is not on the agenda, Bob Debus has had this case thrown back at him four times with no doubt that it is his responsibility to see that the justice system operates with honesty and integrity, he has chosen to dodge his responsibility with no action, at this point I notice he has been moved out of the office of Attorney General obviously because of incompetence. Then we have the Governor General. His duty as an appointee of the Queen of England is to see to it that the Colony of Australia is being governed properly and in accordance with our Constitution. For a start he was supposed to have been appointed by the British Government as an independent neutral witness, he was not, he was appointed by the illegal Government of Australia, he is one of them and like them occupies his office illegally, his answer to my letter is a refusal to perform his duty of care and a copout. He is guilty of dereliction of duty of care, breach of mercantile law etc. Mr Scully has just lost his job for dishonesty that speaks for itself .Mr Debnam Mr Howard and Mr Ruddock have refused to reply, which is simply Dereliction of duty of care. It seems our entire system will put their support behind the criminal element in their service to the community rather than serve their electorate and their country, with honesty and integrity. I must repeat what we hear almost every day, there is no justice in the law, is any one surprised when the basis of our Fabian Marxist system is deceit, see Fabian coat of arms shame on you all. It is absolutely disgraceful and an abomination. It is your choice Australia do you want to live under these dishonest tyrants who have sold our Bank the Commonwealth Bank and our Reserve Bank to foreigners who now dictate our finances, the freeing up of the banks was supposed to create competition and make banking cheaper, what a lie! Banking has never been more expensive and the Banks profits have never been bigger, they knew it then and now so do we, they are busy selling off every thing that belongs to every Australian, it is not theirs to sell it is ours, they even had the Gaul to attempt to sell the Snowy River hydro electric generators, they realised that would be a major vote looser and have backed off for now but be assured, their foreign masters want it, they will eventually get it as was GST unless we stop them. Wouldn’t you prefer to have a say in the running of your country. Think carefully, do not leave it to others, get up and be counted, get a party and a Candidate you can trust onto Parliament, or end up living under a Marxist regime like the Russians lived under for fifty odd years where those in the Kremlin lived in luxury while the Russian people were dirt poor. All that is needed for this evil to grow is for good people to do nothing. THE FABIAN WAY This Fabian Marxist Government as quoted by Bob Hawk wants to remove our right to own property. Gradualism is their tool to achieve their goals and this is how it works. To take away our property ownership they have introduced land tax, it started off on just a few properties, those few peoples objections were hardly heard and we got used to the idea, notice how the number of properties land taxed have since grown and how the amounts have risen, eventually it will include all our homes and the tax will be so high that we will find it cheaper to relinquish our homes to the Government and rent from them, we will then be told where to live and where to work, this is Marxism. This is another win for gradualism and a step closer to a Marxist global dictatorship. In this world there are and should be consequences for everything we do, rewards for good effort and suffering for bad works and laziness, don’t be lazy it is time to act.
Maurice P Roberts Lot 42 Greswick Rd East Seaham NSW 2324 28 Aug 2006 Mr Peter Debnam. Leader of the Opposition. Parliament House Macquarie St. Sydney NSW 2000.
Dear Sir, Over leaf you will find a letter to Mr Howard, followed by the evidence of the dishonesty within our departments of Justice and the Police. This behaviour is not acceptable and it concerns you directly. The Labour state Government are responsible for rectifying this fiasco but have refused to perform their duty of care in a most dishonest way. Law and order was a major issue which got Mr Carr into Parliament on the promise of more Police and a crack down on crime within the courts. What a lie, there are as many police in NSW now as there were fourteen years ago. Crime is out of control and a lot of us are of the opinion that these dishonest Judges, Magistrates, Barristers and Lawyers think their duty is to protect the criminals from their victims as in my case. For those in the position of serving Justice to behave in this dishonest manner is a disgrace, deplorable and displays a lack of integrity. We now depend on you and Mr Howard to take a stand against the rot in the system and bring back the honesty, integrity and justice Australia was renowned for. I think I should inform you that this information is about to be put onto a Website, this will allow the public to gain the knowledge and understanding of the justice system they need to act in defence of themselves. There will also be provision for those who have suffered an injustice due to the perjury committed in the courts to add their cases to the website which we will present to you to present to the government to see to it that each and every one of us receives what is known in Australia as a fair go, a just judgement which our Constitution Guarantees us. Trusting you will take up this most serious matter and do what Mr Carr and Mr Iemma and their appointees have refused point blanc to address. I Remain Maurice P Roberts To see replies from Mr. Debnam CLICK HERE THE FATAL END It has become obvious that justice is not on the agenda, Bob Debus has had this case thrown back at him four times with no doubt that it is his responsibility to see that the justice system operates with honesty and integrity, he has chosen to dodge his responsibility with no action, at this point I notice he has been moved out of the office of Attorney General obviously because of incompetence. Then we have the Governor General. His duty as an appointee of the Queen of England is to see to it that the Colony of Australia is being governed properly and in accordance with our Constitution. For a start he was supposed to have been appointed by the British Government as an independent neutral witness, he was not, he was appointed by the illegal Government of Australia, he is one of them and like them occupies his office illegally, his answer to my letter is a refusal to perform his duty of care and a copout. He is guilty of dereliction of duty of care, breach of mercantile law etc. Mr Scully has just lost his job for dishonesty that speaks for itself Mr. Debnam Mr Howard and Mr Ruddock have refused to reply, this also applies to Fred Nile, none of them have any intention of honouring the pledge they made when they were sworn into parliament to serve the people of Australia with honesty and integrity. It seems our entire system will put their support behind the criminal element in their service to the community rather than serve their electorate and their country, with honesty and integrity. I must repeat what we hear almost every day, there is no justice in the law, is any one surprised when the basis of our Fabian Marxist system is deceit, see Fabian coat of arms shame on you all. It is absolutely disgraceful and an abomination. It is your choice Australia do you want to live under these dishonest tyrants who have sold our Bank the Commonwealth Bank and our Reserve Bank to foreigners who now dictate our finances, the freeing up of the banks was supposed to create competition and make banking cheaper, what a lie! Banking has never been more expensive and the Banks profits have never been bigger, they knew it then and now so do we, they are busy selling off every thing that belongs to every Australian, it is not theirs to sell it is ours, they even had the Gaul to attempt to sell the Snowy River hydro electric generators, they realised that would be a major vote looser and have backed off for now but be assured, their foreign masters want it, they will eventually get it as was GST unless we stop them. Wouldn’t you prefer to have a say in the running of your country. Think carefully, do not leave it to others, get up and be counted, get a party and a Candidate you can trust onto Parliament, or end up living under a Marxist regime like the Russians lived under for fifty odd years where those in the Kremlin lived in luxury while the Russian people were dirt poor. All that is needed for this evil to grow is for good people to do nothing. RAMIFICATIONS Some people can be fooled all the time and all the people can be fooled some of the time but we all know all the people can’t be fooled all the time. How dumb were these people who have infiltrated our political parties, to get a seat in Parliament, with the intention of running their foreign agenda, knowing full well that what they were doing is in breach of our constitution and is a criminal offence called TREASON. The punishment in Australia for Treason is the Death penalty. These are politically correct facts not an opinion. The ramifications for this behaviour are just this. Mr. and Ms. Fabian and Nicholls comrades. As your seats in Parliament were not legal you were not entitled to the taxpayer funded income you received, you were not entitled to the allowances you made use of to carry out your ploy and must therefore be paid back. None of the laws you made or changed have been made or changed, read the constitution, it says you are not capable of sitting in either the upper or lower house and therefore incapable or making changes. You may all think you have eliminated capitol punishment which will save you all from execution when your treason is exposed, but you have not eliminated capitol punishment, at least some of you should have known that since you were all illegal you could not make any changes, how did you all think you were going to get away with it indefinitely, as it stands now to be politically correct all the infrastructure you have sold off like Telecom the Commonwealth bank and all the other services which were not yours to sell in the first place will be reclaimed and the buyers who were fully aware of these facts are going to have to hand back these ill begotten possessions which belong to every Australian, You will all have to make good all the loses caused by your actions which will probably cost you all every cent you have, that will not make much difference to any of you as you will then all be executed for Treason. What were you all thinking, are you all soft or just plain stupid. The question now is are any of you stupid enough to take a chance and stand at the next election to aggravate your situation, or are you all going to run, if you loose the next election which is guaranteed you will have no one to blame for your own demise but yourselves. I am sure you all understand that this will spell the end to the Fabians the Nicholls and any other organisation that thinks they can run their agenda from the Australian Parliament. POSSIBILITIES FOR THE FUTURE Starting with the department of Justice, it is suggested that a new department be created at our Universities, specifically for the education of the countries new world Judges, who will be taught absolute truth as the basis of judgement and a supreme sense of Justice, they will understand that perjury is a criminal offence and must not be tolerated. These Judges will replace all the totally dopy dishonest and incompetent Judges and Magistrates. The next step will be to re-educate the police, they will be brought back to the basic truth that their job is to arrest and charge criminals, not the victims, this idea that the crime can be reversed with the shop owner being charged with some trumped up charge and the criminal not only walks away with the stolen goods but is also compensated with thousands of dollars as if he were the victim. This is not acceptable. It dose not take a rocket scientist to know this behaviour is evil and wrong, how this behaviour got into the system is beyond all of us, it must and will be stopped. There are many possibilities once the people have a say in the administration of our laws. For instance we all know that on the phone poll eighty-seven to ninety-seven percent of the population want capitol punishment returned, so that will be inevitable, Mr Howard said that if we wanted capitol punishment we would have to find a new Prime minister, that will be good by Mr Howard and the majority of our politicians. The result of this, with decent justice and policing systems will probably be the execution of all those who are or have dealt in drugs and within a year or two our drug problem will be a thing of the past, the devastation of families will stop, so will a lot of the drug related crime. Another plus for this system is that the fear the Judges police and witnesses have from criminal’s reprisals will disappear, just as criminals murder witnesses as dead people don’t talk the same will apply to them. This goes for the rest of criminals as well, this crap about rehabilitation makes the public guinea pigs to see if the rehabilitators are right or not, when they are wrong it often costs a few members of the public their lives, this is not acceptable. Ask for volunteers to be guinea pigs to a vicious murderer, or how about women volunteers to a rapist murderer, your commonsense should tell you that you will not find one, this rehabilitation idea is thrust upon us there is no unilateral agreement, where is the validity in the statement that capitol punishment dose not work, show us the re offenders from the ranks of those who have been executed, there cant be any. It is foolproof. My last plea for justice went out to Mr Debnam and separately to Mr Howard and his federal Attorney general Mr Ruddock, it is now four months since I appealed, by law they must respond within five weeks, I did get an acknowledgement from Mr Debnam for the rest, not a word, ask why? It becomes embarrassing for them; if they acknowledged the facts and were truthful about it they would be committing political suicide. Firstly the sheepskins would have to be removed and the deceit would have to stop, like drug related prostitution, it may prove too difficult, they are too far gone already, how would they reverse what they have done. How would they get back our
These people are willing to destroy their own country for the wealth they all eventually accumulate. No one has ever claimed they are bribed but Bob Hawk Knocked down a four million dollar house to replace it with a seven million dollar house, not bad for a trade union leader. Paul Keating could not find one hundred and twenty thousand to buy a share in a pig farm when he took office, he is worth many millions now. Bob Car is a journalist and is now an adviser to the Macquarie Bank being paid some millions a year. Ironic. All this was planed and deliberate by the most evil and destructive people Australia have ever had the misfortune to have infiltrate their Parliament.
14 Feb 2007 The Honourable Mr Mick Keelty Australian Federal Police PO Box 401 Canberra. 2601.
Dear Sir, I am writing to you under the direction of the Honourable Philip Ruddock Federal Attorney General, see copy of his letter attached. In accordance with the Australian Constitution part IV. Attached. I wish to lay charges of Treason against all those members both sitting and past that are members of and have alliances to the Fabian society and the Nicholls association, both foreign powers running their foreign policies and agenda from the Australian Parliament, this is undoubtedly TREASON. See documented evidence on pages 80 to 84. On page 81 is an extract of Bob Hawk’s speech to the Fabians it was also televised on ABC news, I remember it well I remember the camera turning to the audience; in the front row were some of the Fabian members including Paul Keating sitting with his legs stretched out in front of him, for the full speech search ABC archives. According to my information the list of Fabians is off their Register. The picture is of the cover of a book published by the Fabian society, I have a copy of this book. The Nicholls Association had a web site for your information; you should have the means to investigate this organisation and obtain a list of its members. In Mr Ruddock’s letter he says that the legislation regarding these crimes is set out at Division 80 of the Schedule of the Criminal Code Act1995. The politically correct fact of all laws made or changed after 6th Dec 1972 when Gough Whitlam entered Parliament, as Fabious |